A perfectly valid reason to overuse the word “awesome.”

“Who is Neil Gaiman?” I can’t tell you how many times I’ve had to answer this question. It boggles my little nerdy mind. There seems to be a glitch in the awesomeness-to-famousness ratio matrix here. I recently answered the “Who’s Neil Gaiman?” question by saying that he’s the greatest living scifi/fantasy writer, having forgotten that Ray Bradbury and Terry Pratchett are both still with us. My sincerest apologies to those two elder statesmen, but to say that the three of them make up a triumvirate of badass is the highest form of flattery. That I can muster, anyway. I doubt there’s better company to be in amongst the living.

Here’s the thing about Neil Gaiman: the man can do anything. He writes comics, fiction, nonfiction, screenplays, kid’s books. A multifaceted ninja of the weird, this guy. Which is why it’s even more baffling that people don’t know who he is. Comic book geeks, literature geeks, movie geeks – all of these groups have a damn good reason to adore him, and in a sociological-Venn-diagram-of-normal-human-conversations kind of way, he should be a household name, right? You would think. Although to be fair, my love for Gaiman’s work mostly centers around his novels. Neverwhere blew my mind so completely when I read it. Fucking outstanding. I think I gave a copy to everyone I had to buy a birthday present for that year, which is saying a lot because I don’t normally give store-bought gifts. I could go into a lengthy, gushy review of all of his work, but it’s too much to take on. We’d be here for days.

So why bring him up, then? Well, because he made me cry the other day. (I’ve been talking about crying a lot on the blog lately. You should probably not read anything into that. I’m really ok, I promise.) He gave this year’s commencement speech at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, which was basically just some good advice for young artists from someone looking at them hopefully from the other end of a successful career. The sort of things I wish I’d been told ten or twelve years ago. You can watch and/or read the whole thing here. It’s about twenty minutes of awesome. He’s just so damn charming. One of those guys that you feel in your nerdy bones you’d like to hang out with some day, but you know you’re just not cool enough. Oh, well. One can dream.

I’ve been thinking a lot about what he said in that speech. I can’t imagine someone that talented ever struggling with the sorts of writery problems that schlubs like me deal with. The torture of syntax, the agony of the first draft, the heart palpitations when staring at a blank page. There’s a sort of hero-worshippy thing we do where we imagine those folks don’t sweat over their creations like us, the mere mortals. They just poop out perfect finished novels, don’t they? No, they don’t. Art is hard, but it should be fun. If it’s not fun, you’re not doing it right. (Or, as my mother would say, “If it feels good, do it. If it feels bad, stop.”) I grapple with the idea of being a writer. Well, that’s not entirely true. I know I’m a writer. If I’m not here to write, I don’t know why the fuck I’m here, frankly. What gets me stuck on the hamster wheel is the word “successful.” What does that even mean, in the context of art? That one becomes rich? Famous? Well-known? Happy? I’m incredibly shy and nervous around people, and I hate money. So I’d like to say that happy is enough, that I can write for writing’s sake. And I do. If I don’t feed those ideas, get them out of my head, they just scream and scream and bounce around in there like angry demon children trapped in a ball pit. On the other hand, my brain is wired for words. I think about words probably more than I think about anything else. Putting them together, their sounds and harmonies, their meanings and implications when they’re strung along in a beautiful (or horrible) line. Thinking of them as little gears, clockwork in a bigger machine, and making that machine work properly – that’s heaven.

But to what end? So I can bitch about pop culture on the interwebs? Not really. Don’t get me wrong. This is tremendously fun, and I can’t even begin to express how much it means that you guys actually read this drivel. It keeps me writing; it keeps me thinking. But I look at my novel, sitting lonely in its sad little box, and I feel like I’ve ignored my child, forgotten to pick him up after school and he’s standing in the rain, waiting, trying not to cry. Would it be “success” for me to have it published and make my millions? At this point I’d be grateful to the universe if I could even finish it and be proud of the work. Robert Frost rewrote Two Roads Diverged in a Yellow Wood ninety-two times before he would let it be published. Am I that much of a perfectionist? I really don’t know. But I would like the damn thing to someday see the light of day. To have someone say that they enjoyed it. That it made them think about something they’d never thought about before. That it made them happy. That whole process, the after-the-work-is-finished process? That’s the part that gives me nightmares. And I think that’s the most important part of Gaiman’s speech, that last bit about how the landscape of distribution of art is changing. This is all new territory. There’s no reason to wait for someone to discover you, or tell you your work is valuable. Just do it because you love it. And if it makes even one person happy, or makes even one person think they can do the thing they want or love to do, that’s got to be worth it. Doing it all yourself? We’re allowed to think that way now, and I’m kind of in that weird generation gap where that’s something I have to learn, something I was never taught. Hard to wrap my mind around, still.

I’m glad that there are folks out there like Neil Gaiman who, while they may not be household names, mean so much to the people who do know their work and take the time and the energy to share with us what they’ve learned. There’s something tremendously laudable about not just sitting in some high castle wallowing around in a pile of money, and instead choosing to come down to tell us how to be real artists because artists are important. That we are important, and that it’s up to us as much as it is to the people we admire to create good and beautiful things. So if you don’t know who Neil Gaiman is, I’m not going to try to explain him to you. My advice? Go pick up four books right now: The Absolute Sandman Volume One, American Gods, Graveyard Book, and Blueberry Girl. It’s an expensive but comprehensive overview of Gaiman’s…what?…I don’t know, but I can’t use “awesome” any more in this blog post or I’ll make myself ill. Check out all of his stuff and his wicked (haha! I didn’t say it!) blog at neilgaiman.com.

We all love Star Wars, right?

I missed Star Wars Day on the blog, you guys. I have failed you and I apologize. Guess I just didn’t notice the date. Which tends to happen when one does not have a grownup job. I’m so excited that Star Wars Day exists. And I love a clever holiday. May 4th? May the fourth be with you? Get it? (The Catholic response of course is “And also with you,” which makes me giggle but probably not many other people.) And if you really nerded it up and threw a Star Wars party, your hangover would be revenge of the fifth. Hyuck hyuck.

What can I say about Star Wars that hasn’t been said? It’s been over thirty years since the first movie, and the franchise has probably the most rabid fan base in the history of fan bases (rivaled only by Trekkers). The Star Wars conversation goes on all day every day. What can I contribute? Meh, not much. Don’t get me wrong. I’m a huge fan. I’m not being blasé about my dedication to the cult of Lucas, just about my ability to bring something interesting to the table here. So I’ll fall back on my old reliable position of telling you everything about my experience with a thing instead of my deep thoughts on a thing. Cue the wigglyfuzzy flashback indicator segue things.

The inter-trilogy period was a really exciting time to be a fan. When the remaster of Star Wars (I refuse to call it Episode IV, just deal with it) came out, we were still in late-90′s awe of CG so the new effects were mind blowing. That concept seems so quaint now. And with each re-release, the hype for the prequels just built and built and built. Nerds were frothing at the mouth. We counted down the days on a big wall calendar at the comic book shop. May 19, 1999. It was a Wednesday, which is weird. I don’t think I’ve ever been to another opening-night showing on a Wednesday. My best friend and I hit up the midnight showing and the next day we cut school and went again with his mom (who had called out sick from work to take us – best nerdmom ever). The owner of the movie theater in the next town was a tremendous fan and had spent his life’s savings to renovate the theater just for this movie. He had the George Lucas sound system put in (500-gallon tank of water behind the screen to catch the low bass? Fuck yeah). He came out before every single showing to introduce the movie dressed as a Jedi, light saber in hand. That’s dedication to fandom, folks. Awesome guy. Everybody was in costume, we cheered when the crawl started, people were crying, it was fangirl heaven. One of my all-time favorite moviegoing moments.

And then something happened, a weird trick of my fandom. I can’t really put my finger on it, but at some point between Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones, and then even more noticeably between that one and Revenge of the Sith (you get that hangover joke now, don’t you?), the series lost its appeal. There was no more tortured waiting, no more giddy anticipation. Make no mistake, I saw them all. I enjoyed them all. But there was just something missing. I may very well be a nostalgia junkie here, looking at the first trilogy more fondly because I so loved them in my childhood. (It happens. I’m a sap, really, despite this crusty exterior of cynicism.) I can rationalize it that way. I guess maybe I felt like this thing I loved had been stepped on a little. Getting used to computer animation and special effects probably had a lot to do with it, as well. Once the novelty wears off, all the flash and bang, the tendency of fans is always going to be to analyze the movie not on its own merits, but by comparing it to the originals. Any sequel or reboot is subject to that kind of geeky scrutiny, and Star Wars fans are some of the most obsessive people I’ve ever met.

So I won’t say I don’t like the new ones, but I’ve only seen them a few times each. I’ve seen the first trilogy a million billion times. It never gets old. I never get tired of it. They’re witty and fun, exciting but without melodrama, and surprisingly not cheesy (although a case could be made that they are cheesy and I just ignore it). There’s a bit of a generation gap amongst fans because of this. Younger folks, at least in my experience, tend to like the newer movies more. Older fans appreciate the new ones but have a stronger, more established love for the originals. And of course there are those freaks who love all six equally. Weirdos.

This is a horrible way to wrap this up, but if you’re a Star Wars fan, you absolutely have to watch the movie Fanboys. It’s a love song to exactly this period of time that I’m talking about. Super funny, tons of cameos. A silly, irreverent homage to the movies and the fans. Check it out. And go watch Star Wars again. It’s always going to be good.

Take my love, take my land…

Ok, if you’re already humming the theme song, I sincerely apologize. It is, honestly and truly, the worst theme song ever. And if you get it stuck in your head, I welcome your hatemail.

For those of you not getting the joke, I’m talking about Firefly. One of the most monumental tv fuckups ever perpetrated by the Fox network was cancelling this show. And that’s saying a lot, after the whole Bush/Gore thing.

Quick synopsis: quirky crew living on a spaceship in a post-Earth galaxy, trying to make ends meet via various types of theft and con artistry, while spending most of their time keeping out of the way of an evil overlord-type government (a la the Empire), accidentally take aboard some fugitives running from said government. Everything becomes immediately more intense with the running and the chasing and the outlaw shenanigans. Also, one of them was the victim of a government brain-poking experiment and is now a psycho and may or may not be a psychic.

This does not summarize well. It might be one of those “you had to be there” things. But I can talk around the edges of those things all day long. That’s how I got a Literature degree, bitches.

First of all, let me just get this out of the way: I love Joss Whedon. Love love love. I was a huge Buffy fan. I hate musicals but know every word of Dr. Horrible’s Singalong Blog. And I’m foaming at the mouth waiting for The Avengers. But I’ve got to say that the best thing in the Whedonverse is definitely Firefly. Because it’s so different. Not only from all of Whedon’s other work, but also from everything else on television. Allow me to qualify that statement. It’s a futuristic space western. That’s right. Space. Western. The only one I’ve ever seen done properly. “Oh, but what about Star Wars?” you say? That was a movie (or three, or six…maybe) and it was more a space opera with a bit of a western-style bent, and a couple of good western moments, mostly evidenced by Han Solo’s leather vest and the whole damsel in distress thing. Firefly is a full-on (hot dudes in thigh holsters, dusty shootouts, stolen merchandise rustling, and an occasional horse battle with laser guns, there are even cows at one point) freaking space western! But it’s not gratuitous. Here’s why not: It’s 2517 and Earth is gone and humans are colonizing the outskirts of space. It’s the American western frontier, but on planets that have been terraformed for human use (consumption?). They speak Chinese every now and then, because when Earth fell it was the other superpower and everyone spoke Chinese. Good future-historical realism. They use awesome Asian-feeling guitar music for the same reason (I would say Country-feeling world music, but I hate the term “world music” – don’t we all live in the world?). There’s a really great conspiracy theory backstory. I’m a sucker for a good governmental conspiracy. The cast is fantastic. The effects are top-notch and the sets are amazing. It’s filmed beautifully. And the dialogue’s so witty. I love witty. (Way to a girl’s heart is to be clever; I don’t care what bullshit society feeds you about being rich or good looking – just be clever.) There’s a very en medius res feel to the writing, no pandering or overexplaining or talking down to the audience. A welcome relief in scifi. Furthermore, it’s Joss fucking Whedon. That should really be enough. And if you don’t know who Joss Whedon is, well, there may be something wrong with your geek nerve. You should have that checked out.

Firefly aired on Fox in 2002. They made fourteen episodes, but only got to air eleven before they were cancelled. This is because Fox are (is?) asshats and aired the episodes out of order, then proceeded to change the night and timeslot numerous times so no one knew when it was on. How is this a good idea? For any show? What the hell were they thinking? Meanwhile, people were really stoked about the show but couldn’t find it to watch it, so the ratings were nothing. Ooh, logic. It’s so complicated. Oy, how I hate red tape and bureaucratic fuckery. Especially when it gets in the way of my scifi enjoyment. “Ok, so what, Vanessa? It’s just an old tv show. There are so many. Why do you care about this one so much?” Because it’s not fucking stupid. I’m an American. I’m inundated pretty constantly by things that are inane and ridiculous and worthy of my considerable scorn. Granted, my tv’s not attached to anything but my DVD player, so it’s not as bad as it could be. But even the History Channel and Discovery have gone all reality programming on us, right? Every now and again I find something that’s well-written, well-produced, and emotionally evocative. And of course they fucking cancel it. Because I’m in the minority. Networks don’t care about me and my intellectual snobbery.

No, you know what? I’m not even going to own that. It’s not snobbery. I do not appreciate that the marketing strategy for the vast majority of the entertainment industry is to account for the lowest common denominator. “Looky here, Bumpkin: bright things! Shiny things! Things that yell! Things that explode! There, there, don’t you worry about real life. Just sit there in your nice, comfy chair and get fatter. Worry about these things that we’re telling you that you want to buy but you can’t because you’re broke. Continue to feel worthless because you can’t meet these material goals. Stress yourself out tomorrow at your job that you hate and that doesn’t pay you enough to feed your family with food that’s not real. And then when your blood pressure goes up and you die of a heart attack, you won’t be miserable about the sad state of your sorry wasted life, because we told you that that’s what your short time here on Earth is all about.”

Sorry. I kind of took a hard turn there at the end.

And I don’t mean to be so down on the American masses all the time. I’d like to think that most people are smarter than they’re given credit for. It’s a testament to their opinion of us that we think about ourselves this way.

There’s really no way to transition out of this rant. Awkward.

Anyway, despite all my flying off the handle, you should check out Firefly. You can find it on DVD (should I be capitalizing that? I don’t even know) in all its fourteen-episode awesomeness, with the bonus features and all the blah blah. And I recommend that you buy it instead of watching it online or something, because homeboy needs royalties so we can get more geeky things out of him (like The Avengers – have I mentioned I’m excited about The Avengers?).

The Beardy One

Oh, Patrick Rothfuss, where do I even begin? Perhaps at the beginning.

Once upon a time, I was in a writer’s group with some kickass scifi/fantasy nerds. One day, one of these excellent people, my buddy Jonathan (who will eventually bring us a fantastic graphic novel about the anthropomorphic exploits of the Seven Deadly Sins – I’ll keep you guys posted), handed me a book and said, “There are no words.” I had a total Matrix moment and was all “But books are just words, man.” Then I caught up and understood and went about my day. Then I started reading this book and the world fell apart for a minute.

It was that good. There are, in fact, no words. But I’ve got to try because that’s my gig here. Urm, so, here goes: Take everything you love about Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, and Game of Thrones and cut out all the bullshit. Take the good stuff that’s left and distill it down through a little bit dark, Joss Whedonesque, Quentin Tarantinoish, violent but beautiful and funny kind of filter. Then add obsessive lute playing, homeless starving orphans, drug addicts, mythical bad guys, some crazy demon spider monster things, unrequited love, and a dragon-lizard.

This will leave you reeling from an unreasonable amount of awesomeness.

So I read the book (The Name of the Wind, by the way, for titular clarity) in, like, a day. It’s a pretty hefty book. I may have laid out of work to finish it. Which I did more than once. (You can’t call out with “I hate my thankless, soulsucking job.” So fuck it. Call out sick and stay home and do what you love.) I immediately wrote an email to Mr. Rothfuss, telling him how mind-blowingly good his book was and that he had kind of fucked up the curve for the rest of the class and I felt like I didn’t have the chops to keep writing anymore, what with my face being melted by his greatness and all. And he wrote me back! A real live email, not a famous-guy form letter. He told me that no one’s going to write my stories if I don’t do it. And that we all need good books to remind us of that. Such a nice guy. Beardy guys are usually nice. Weird how that happens.

That all happened in early 2009. Book two in the series was supposed to come out that Christmas, according to the rumor mill at the Giant Evil Bookstore. So we waited and waited and Christmas came and went and we waited and reread book one and now it’s the end of 2010 and what the hell is going on?!? My nerds and I got agro. Meanwhile we’d been sustaining ourselves on Rothfuss’s blog and the fucking phenomenal graphic novel/picture book he put out (The Princess and Mr. Whiffle).

Long story short (or not) the second book (The Wise Man’s Fear) came out in March of 2011 and shot straight to the top of the NYT bestseller list. Hells yeah! I called out sick again to stay home and read it. And I forfeited my massive Giant Evil Bookstore employee discount to buy a signed edition from our local independent bookstore. Totally worth it, and I love that Rothfuss prefers to do signings and readings at small indie stores. Mad respect for that, sir; it’s important and means a lot. I tell you friends, in all honestly, and I don’t get to say this often: the second one was everything I wanted it to be. Just as good as the first. Not better, not worse. Just a seamless continuation. Which, judging by the few people who have been able to pull it off, must be hard as balls to do. I was so impressed. Usually I come out of a sequel wishing it was as good as the first one, or wishing it hadn’t been so good as to make the first one seem bad. But with Rothfuss’s books, it was like I had just turned a page. Brilliant.

And now I’m deep in the throes of waiting for the third book. Oh, the agony. The torture. But whatever. There are a lot of assholes out there who are giving the man guff about how long he takes between books. These are really long books, guys (according to Rothfuss, Name of the Wind is as long as Harry Potters 1-3, and Wise Man’s Fear is almost as long as the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy), and they have to be written, edited, rewritten, reedited, typeset, printed, distributed, etc, etc. You can’t just yell at an author to sit down in front of a computer and expect him to turn fucking tricks for you. Just, you know, for the record. Also, Rothfuss is a busy dude. Raising a kid, trying to have a somewhat normal (on a bestselling author, famous guy kind of scale) life, and running a pretty great charity. Cut him some slack. Chill out. Read his blog. Cultivate some patience. It will be worth the wait.

But I guess the real reason I wrote this blog, besides trying to spread the tao of Rothfuss, is that little note he wrote me. He’s totally right. We need some books to be better than others. To shake us up, remind us why we love them. I’ve read so many books. So. Many. And I don’t know if it’s just that my brain can only store so much, or that they’re really all the same, but I tend to forget most of them as soon as I’m done. I read The Name of the Wind at that perfect time: I’d been bored for a while, even reading the classics. The important ones that everyone should have read, but everything that’s been written since then is based on them, so when you read them you feel like you’ve read them before? Sad but true. Like Tolkien. I love Tolkien, but there are so many books that have been written by rabid Tolkien fans that when you read his stuff it can seem old hat, and it’s really unfortunate, for Tolkien and for us. But the ones that are great, the ones you want to read over and over, the ones that you remember everything about – those are the books that matter. When you’re struck down by good writing, rendered entirely useless because you’ve been sucked into another world and don’t want to leave, when you get it stuck in your head like a bad song. Man, that’s a great feeling, isn’t it? And, at least for me, it happens so rarely that it’s stunning. So, yeah, go read the first two so we can all do a delirious happy dance together when the third one comes out. Info on Rothfuss’s books, charity, and his awesome blog are all at patrickrothfuss.com.

All hail the Stephen!

A while ago I mentioned in passing that I planned to write a post about my rabid Stephen King fandom. He’s got a new book coming out in April (the 24th, a Tuesday), so I figured now would be a good time for that post, while my booknerd dander’s all up in anticipation (dander? hackles? I think hackles). Furthermore, this new one is in the Dark Tower storysphere, so I’m extra squishy excited about it. If you never read another Stephen King book, at the very very least, read the Dark Tower series. In. Cred. Ible. (I love that breaking-up-words-for-emphasis convention. I love being able to say “Ible” in a sentence. Go to hell, spell check.)

So when I was in sixth grade somebody (probably my sister, she’s a bad/good influence) gave me a copy of The Stand. For which I got sent home from school and my parents got called in to a meeting about my “emotional development.” Keeping in mind that my parents are very bright people, it should come as no surprise that they told the school administrators to get fucked and that an eleven year old who could read and comprehend and enjoy pretty complex adult fiction was the least of their redneck, backwoods, puritanical little concerns. When you’ve got kids in middle school with kids of their own, it blows my mind that these people took the time to gripe about my reading habits. My father, ever the confrontational atheist, made a point to ask them whether my reading level was the problem or the material. Specifically: “If she had a copy of the Bible, would you be throwing this shit fit?” And then we walked out. And went to the bookstore. I honestly don’t know that the principal understood the question. No one down there thinks of the Bible as a book. But that’s a conversation for another time.

I guess that experience meant a lot. Not because the book was hyped up and made taboo, but because it wasn’t. Tell a kid that they can’t do something and they’ll want to do it even more. But tell them that they can keep doing something that they really enjoy and you won’t judge them for it, and they’ll go apeshit crazy. I spent the next couple of years reading mostly Stephen King. I read them all and then suddenly there weren’t any more. Which is torture, isn’t it? You try to find something to fill that hole where your favorite writer goes and nothing quite fits. It’s a square peg situation, and I was too young to have really discerning taste so I went through a wicked horror novel phase during which I would read pretty much anything with ghosts, demons, death, destruction, serial killers, fucking ancient space alien monster gods. Whatever. Did not contribute to my middle school/early high school goth weirdness period at all. Nah. Not even a little. I swear. “Emotional development.” Pfft.

And then Kerouac came along and I went through a Grateful Dead phase and started wearing tie-dye and taking a lot of hallucinogens and Stephen King kind of took a backseat for a minute.

I kept up. I wasn’t a total slacker fan. But let’s face it. He had some weird shit come out in the 90′s. There are three distinct periods to King’s work. The early stuff when he was poor and raising kids and drinking too much. That is the Golden Age (to use a comics analogy that doesn’t quite fit) of Stephen King. Very punk rock. And then he had the middle years when he was sober and his kids were grown and he was kind of bored and it showed. Not that it’s not good writing. Some decent stuff came out of that period, but it all felt like he was ripping off a Stephen King book. Between Insomnia and Hearts in Atlantis, pretty much. And then some drunk asshole hit him with a van and he almost died and his career was invigorated again! Thank the gods for drunk assholes in panel vans. No, not really. I wept when I heard it on the radio because they got a bad report and said that he had died. (It’s called due diligence, people. Give it a try.) My sister had to sit on the floor with me and listen to me babble and cry. Oh, it was awful. But then when they said they fucked up we all did a happy dance. He was risen! Like, um, who was that guy who came back from the dead in the Bible? No, no, the other guy. Shit, I’ll remember it in a minute…

Anyway, everything since then has been awesome. King said after the accident that he wasn’t going to write anymore, that he had three books in a safe deposit box that were finished and he would publish those and complete the Dark Tower series and that would be that. But the books kept coming. The dude’s got an addiction, frankly. Drank too much, did too much coke (that might just be a rumor, I honestly don’t know if it’s true), plays the guitar. These are all things writers do to distract themselves from the fact that writing is their real fix. You don’t have hobbies or habits when you’re a writer, you have procrastination tools. Bonus. Score.

Lazarus! It was Lazarus.

But I guess I should get to the point, hmm? (Sorry, too many procrastination tools. But wine’s so cheap in California.) Why do I love Stephen King? It’s a conversation I’ve had quite a few times, actually. Not foamy fangirl “you’ve gotta gotta read this” kinds of conversations, which is what you’d expect. No, most of my Stephen King discussions are in his defense, oddly. Fucking literature people are snobs, man, for real. In college I had so many folks scoff when I said he’s my favorite. Apparently being a #1 bestselling author forty-something times makes your talent questionable? Who knew? “But it’s so pop,” “But it’s just fluff,” “But he only writes horror,” and so on. Which is exactly the sort of thing that people repeat because it’s what they’ve heard. It’s petty name dropping in reverse, basically. King got too popular and his reputation suffered for it, I guess.

I don’t give a good goddamn how many books you sell. A fine storyteller is a fine storyteller is a fine storyteller in my book (icky pun, sorry). Stephen King’s work falls into what I have dubbed the “weird shit happening to normal people” category. Which is a style that sucks you in with a quickness. Usually I’m hooked by the first chapter or so. In fact, I tend to chop two days out of my schedule when a new one comes out and do nothing else until it’s finished. (Now you all know why I always called out sick on Tuesdays and Wednesdays.) And here’s where the clichés kick in. It’s intricately woven storytelling. He tends to start with a big cast of characters and either whittle it down to a nub of important players, or just make all their stories eventually collide. Excellent worldbuilding. Most of it is horror set in our world, but there’s a big whack of his work that’s fantasy, a few I would call scifi, the occasional supernatural love story. With two distinct personalities and writing styles (he used to write as another author who died of cancer of the pseudonym; occasionally one of his lost manuscripts will “surface”). And that’s just the novels. He’s also a master of the short story, which I think is an even harder form to wrangle with, but he does it well. Another point in his favor, that he can do both. Not a lot of writers like that. And nonfiction! Danse Macabre is one of the best books on the history of horror.

Anyway, I’m just gushing now. I’ll stop. But seriously. Don’t believe all those stuck-up book people who say Stephen King’s no good. Or don’t knock until you’ve tried. Even if you do see his work as just shallow pop fiction (which it’s not), we all occasionally need some junk food for our brains, don’t we? There’s some cheap therapy opportunities there.

Wormhole Deliciousness

I know I’ll lose a lot of credibility for saying this (ok, let’s be real – I didn’t have any fucking credibility to start with) but man, do I love me some Stargate. It’s one of those things you know you shouldn’t love but you just…can’t…help it. Like that one-hit-wonder song that you turn way up when it comes on and sing at the top of your lungs. But only if no one else is in the car. Guilty pleasures. And I’m a total fangirl about it. I’ve got every season and every spinoff and all the movies on DVD. I’ve watched all the special features and every episode with the commentary on. I know every character’s whole fucking life story, every alien race, every planet, every contradiction, every hanging lantern (look up that writery term, non-English majors, mwahahaha). I’m probably more of a geek about Stargate than I am about anything else. Except books, but that doesn’t count. Booklove is an overarching, penetrating-every-aspect-of-who-I-am kind of obsession. Scifi fandom is way more focused. It’s the difference between breathing air and loving a particular smell. I’ve really got to stop talking in analogies. Or just find better analogies.

Anyway, Stargate’s underrated. It’s cheesy. Like, really cheesy. But not hammy, like Farscape. And it doesn’t take itself too seriously, like Babylon 5. Admittedly, I like both of those as well. The thing about Stargate is that you get really sucked in by the characters. Each episode is different, more or less, because the story arc follows the people, not the people chasing the story arc (like X-files, say, or Lost). It’s a scifi show running almost entirely on a soap opera dynamic. Which can create massive amounts of cheese, but works really well. In a crack-addict kind of way.

I’ve caught a lot of shit for my Stargate fandom. From geeks and nongeeks alike. Nongeeks (civilians, I call them, which is terribly exclusive and offensive but whatever)  make fun of me for my fangirl gushiness. About all this stuff, not just Stargate. Other scifi fans make fun just because it’s Stargate and not something else. And that, to me, is what’s most interesting. How can someone wearing a Starfleet uniform find any leg to stand on to make fun of me or Stargate? Seriously? (Not that there’s anything wrong with cosplay, don’t send me hatemail.)

At the bottom of it, there are two ways to see this phenomenon:

1) People are viciously protective of the things they love and will defend them as better than other things that other people love. It’s an interesting point of modern human nature and can’t be avoided, so why analyze it? Or,

2) there really is some invisible underpinning of scifi hierarchy. Maybe some things really do mean more to geekdom than others. This could be totally made up, and I’d have to leave my abandoned little corner of the world and venture out into civilization to examine it further. If anyone wants to buy me Comic-Con tickets, I’m totally down for a research trip.

But think about it. When you think “scifi geek” what comes immediately to mind? Star Wars and Star Trek, right? There’s a big beef between these groups of fans, which I plan to dissect another time. Coming soon to a blog near you. Point is, everything else kind of falls below and between these two megaliths of nerdism. But why, damn it, why? There’s structure here. I just can’t quite figure it out. For the record, I love Star Trek and Star Wars equally. But they’re very different. And they’re related. It’s like loving your creepy identical twin sisters the same way even though one’s a goth and one’s a jock. (True story.)

I feel like the things we love in the scifi universe (multiverse?) are more like a spectrum and less like a Venn diagram. Or should be, anyway. Maybe a color wheel. Something less dividey, is what I’m saying. None of them is, intrinsically, any more or less silly than another. We think they are, but they’re not. If we’re talking about production value or acting, some things are definitely “better,” but only in technical terms. Some shows have more money or better marketing or a worse time slot or they’ve been rendered absurd just by virtue of time having passed. But that doesn’t change the content or the intent. It doesn’t change the love of the fans. Scifi is all about suspension of disbelief. If I can buy that a Federation of planets would send out multiple ships to peacefully explore the far reaches of the universe, why would I then turn around and not believe that a telekinetic dictator would want to rule a galaxy far, far away with a Nazi-like iron fist? I wouldn’t. I don’t. Equally ridiculous and fun. So don’t tell me that it’s out of the question for a bunch of American Air Force officers, a clueless linguist/archaeologist, and a rogue alien soldier to go through an ancient wormhole device every week for ten years and explore new planets, under presidential order via a big fat government conspiracy. It could  totally happen.

 

Also, just as a fangirl side note, if you did want to start watching Stargate, for whatever reason, a few points:

- Watch the original movie first. The show picks up right where it leaves off.

- The first season and a half or so is the cheesiest. But it gets way better, and their budget gets bigger. Plus you need those episodes to get a few key story points.

- There are some contradictions in the rules. Ignore them. All the characters do.

- Don’t get attached. Everyone dies at least once.

- Let me know what you think. We can gush together. Or not. Whatever.